Friday Smash 2.0: The Foundation That Builds Everything

Every great rider, every season that clicks into place, every performance breakthrough — they all start with one thing: foundation. But foundation isn’t just long miles or “time in Zone 2.” It’s the quiet, often overlooked layer of physiology that determines how well your body can adapt, how efficiently it can produce energy, and how deeply it can sustain effort when everything else begins to fail.

When I coach athletes through their foundation phase, I remind them that endurance isn’t built overnight or through monotony. It’s sculpted through a balance of physiological adaptation, metabolic efficiency, neuromuscular development, and psychological resilience. This isn’t about being comfortable — it’s about creating an engine that’s both powerful and unbreakable.

What Foundation Really Means

When we talk about building a foundation, we’re really talking about developing aerobic durability — your body’s ability to produce energy efficiently over long durations using oxygen as its main currency (Coyle, 1995). A strong foundation changes your physiology at a cellular level. It increases mitochondrial density, improves capillarization, enhances oxygen delivery, and strengthens your body’s ability to clear lactate and utilize fat as a fuel source (Holloszy & Coyle, 1984).

True endurance isn’t about how many hours you ride in Zone 2. It’s about teaching your body how to sustain output without falling apart. Foundation is the art of balancing fatigue and efficiency — training your body to do more with less, to hold power deeper into a ride, and to remain stable when everyone else begins to fade.

That’s why I like to say: you’re not just logging time, you’re building resistance to decay.

The Science Behind Endurance

Endurance training activates a powerful process called mitochondrial biogenesis — your body’s way of creating more of the cellular “power plants” responsible for energy production (Hood et al., 2011). The enzymes inside those mitochondria become more efficient at burning fat, preserving glycogen, and producing clean, sustainable energy.

At the same time, capillary density increases — meaning more tiny blood vessels feeding your muscles, delivering oxygen, and clearing out byproducts like lactate (Hudlicka et al., 1992). Your heart becomes more efficient, your breathing more stable, and your muscles learn to operate under lower metabolic stress.

All of these changes come from time spent under controlled aerobic load. But that doesn’t mean mindless spinning. Foundation isn’t passive. It’s precise. Each ride provides a signal — and how you manage that signal determines how your body responds (Seiler, 2010).

Beyond Zone 2: The Role of Cadence and Variation

One of the most common misconceptions about foundation work is that it’s just long, easy rides. And yes — we need those. But real foundation goes beyond static intensity. The body thrives on variation.

You can hold the same power at 65 RPM, 85 RPM, or 100 RPM — but each one elicits a different training effect (Hansen et al., 2007).

Low cadence (60–75 RPM) work builds muscular endurance and torque. It recruits more Type IIA fibers, developing the kind of muscular tension that helps you push big gears up climbs or grind through headwinds. It’s strength training on the bike, teaching your muscles to sustain controlled force over time (Marsh & Martin, 1995).

Mid cadence (80–90 RPM) is your steady-state endurance gear. This is where your cardiovascular and muscular systems are in harmony — efficient oxygen use, stable heart rate, sustainable effort. It’s the bread and butter of endurance training (Coyle et al., 1991).

High cadence (95–110 RPM) taps into neuromuscular coordination. It refines your pedal stroke, smooths efficiency, and reduces localized fatigue (Neptune & Herzog, 2000). It’s your “speed economy” — the ability to ride fluidly and recover quickly when terrain or pace shifts.

Changing cadence at constant power teaches your body versatility. It forces adaptation across systems — muscular, neural, and metabolic. Foundation work that includes cadence variation builds a more complete rider. You’re not just strong; you’re adaptable.

Metabolic Adaptation: Fueling the Foundation

A crucial but often misunderstood part of foundation training is fueling. Many athletes assume that training endurance means restricting fuel to “train fat adaptation.” But that’s not how the body truly learns to perform.

When you fuel properly — especially with carbohydrates during long sessions — you maintain consistent output, allowing your body to train the aerobic system under quality stress. This consistent stress signals the body to build more mitochondria and improve fat oxidation efficiency (Impey et al., 2018). Starving yourself, on the other hand, downregulates performance and limits the training signal (Burke et al., 2017).

Endurance training teaches your metabolism to choose fuel wisely. It’s not about burning fat for the sake of burning fat. It’s about building a system that can access both fat and glycogen efficiently, depending on the demand. That’s what allows you to ride strong at hour six the same way you did at hour one (Jeukendrup, 2011).

The Neural and Psychological Side of Endurance

Endurance is as much a mental skill as a physiological one. Long, steady rides train the brain to focus, to maintain rhythm, and to find calm inside repetition. Every steady-state effort is a lesson in patience — in managing micro-fatigue, controlling emotional spikes, and staying connected to the process (Marcora & Staiano, 2010).

From a neural standpoint, endurance training sharpens motor unit recruitment and firing efficiency. When cadence or torque changes, your nervous system learns to communicate more effectively with muscle fibers, improving coordination and reducing wasted energy (Enoka & Duchateau, 2016).

I often remind riders: endurance training builds mental and neural resilience. You’re not just strengthening your body’s engine — you’re wiring your brain to handle long-term effort, to focus under discomfort, and to move efficiently when tired.

Adaptation: The Cellular Conversation

Every endurance ride is a conversation between stress and recovery. The magic doesn’t happen during the ride — it happens afterward, when your body interprets the stress and adapts.

Low-intensity endurance activates AMPK and PGC-1α pathways — biochemical signals that tell your cells to produce more mitochondria (Baar, 2014). High-cadence work refines neuromuscular pathways, while torque work improves oxidative enzyme activity (Holloszy & Coyle, 1984). Together, they create a system that can go longer, harder, and recover faster.

When you vary intensity and cadence intelligently, you’re not just training the cardiovascular system. You’re strengthening the communication between your brain, muscles, and metabolism. That’s the true mark of a durable athlete.

Why Foundation Never Ends

Foundation isn’t a one-time phase — it’s a lifelong pillar. Even professional cyclists return to foundational work every season because mitochondrial turnover is constant (Granata et al., 2018). If you stop maintaining your aerobic base, you lose efficiency within weeks.

Your foundation is the framework that supports every other type of training — VO₂ max intervals, anaerobic work, tempo, racing. Without it, intensity sits on a weak structure. It’s like trying to build a skyscraper on sand.

Every great performance relies on this invisible base. It’s the unglamorous part of training — quiet, methodical, sometimes frustratingly slow. But it’s the part that decides who still has power left when the race hits hour eight, when the wind picks up, or when the climb never seems to end.

---

References

Baar, K. (2014). Using molecular biology to maximize concurrent training. Sports Medicine, 44(Suppl 2), 117–125.

Burke, L. M., Hawley, J. A., Jeukendrup, A., Morton, J. P., Stellingwerff, T., & Maughan, R. J. (2017). Toward a common understanding of diet–exercise strategies to manipulate fuel availability for training and competition preparation in endurance sport. International Journal of Sport Nutrition and Exercise Metabolism, 28(5), 451–463.

Coyle, E. F. (1995). Integration of the physiological factors determining endurance performance ability. Exercise and Sport Sciences Reviews, 23(1), 25–63.

Coyle, E. F., Sidossis, L. S., Horowitz, J. F., & Beltz, J. D. (1991). Cycling efficiency is related to the percentage of type I muscle fibers. Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise, 24(7), 782–788.

Enoka, R. M., & Duchateau, J. (2016). Translating fatigue to human performance. Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise, 48(11), 2228–2238.

Granata, C., Jamnick, N. A., & Bishop, D. J. (2018). Principles of exercise prescription, and how they influence exercise-induced changes of transcription factors and other regulators of mitochondrial biogenesis. Sports Medicine, 48(7), 1541–1559.

Hansen, E. A., Andersen, J. L., Nielsen, J. S., & Sjogaard, G. (2007). Muscle fiber type, efficiency, and mechanical output in cycling. European Journal of Applied Physiology, 101(5), 577–584.

Holloszy, J. O., & Coyle, E. F. (1984). Adaptations of skeletal muscle to endurance exercise and their metabolic consequences. Journal of Applied Physiology, 56(4), 831–838.

Hood, D. A., Tryon, L. D., Carter, H. N., Kim, Y., & Chen, C. C. (2011). Unravelling the mechanisms regulating muscle mitochondrial biogenesis. Biochemical Journal, 440(3), 465–473.

Hudlicka, O., Brown, M. D., & Egginton, S. (1992). Angiogenesis in skeletal and cardiac muscle. Physiological Reviews, 72(2), 369–417.

Impey, S. G., Hearris, M. A., Hammond, K. M., Bartlett, J. D., Louis, J., Close, G. L., & Morton, J. P. (2018). Fuel for the work required: A theoretical framework for carbohydrate periodization and the glycogen threshold hypothesis. Sports Medicine, 48(5), 1031–1048.

Jeukendrup, A. E. (2011). Nutrition for endurance sports: Marathon, triathlon, and road cycling. Journal of Sports Sciences, 29(Suppl 1), S91–S99.

Marcora, S. M., & Staiano, W. (2010). The limit to exercise tolerance in humans: Mind over muscle? European Journal of Applied Physiology, 109(4), 763–770.

Marsh, A. P., & Martin, P. E. (1995). Effect of cycling experience, aerobic power, and power output on preferred and most economical cycling cadences. Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise, 27(7), 1225–1232.

Neptune, R. R., & Herzog, W. (2000). Adaptation of muscle coordination to altered task mechanics during steady-speed cycling. Journal of Biomechanics, 33(2), 165–172.

Seiler, S. (2010). What is best practice for training intensity and duration distribution in endurance athletes? International Journal of Sports Physiology and Performance, 5(3), 276–291.